UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $15,000,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY HELD BY SHAKE-N-GO FASHION, INC. AND MODEL MODEL HAIR FASHION, INC.

Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: $15,000,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY HELD BY SHAKE-N-GO FASHION, INC. AND MODEL MODEL HAIR FASHION, INC.
Case Number: 2:2014cv00309
Filed: January 16, 2014
Court: New Jersey District Court
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Susan D. Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $15,000,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY HELD BY SHAKE-N-GO FASHION, INC. AND MODEL MODEL HAIR FASHION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: EVAN SCOTT WEITZ(Designation Retained)
Represented By: AARON MENDELSOHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: $15,000,000 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY FORMERLY HELD BY SHAKE-N-GO FASHION, INC. AND MODEL MODEL HAIR FASHION, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.