BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 5 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION & ANNUITY FUNDS v. TOLSON
| BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 5 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION & ANNUITY FUNDS, RICHARD E. TOLSON, TRUSTEES OF THE B.A.C. LOCAL 4 PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS,, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY B.A.C. HEALTH FUND,, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY BM&P APPRENTICE AND EDUCATION FUND,, TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND,, TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL MASONRY INSTITUTE and RICHARD E. TOLSON, as Administrator of B.A.C. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF NEW JERSEY |
| KF STUCCO, INC.. |
| 2:2014cv02948 |
| May 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Essex |
| Katharine S. Hayden |
| Cathy L. Waldor |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Default Judgment in the sum of $19,061.76 in favor of pltfs' Trustees of New Jersey B.A.C. Health Fund, Trustees of the New Jersey BM&P Apprentice and Education Fund Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, and Richard Tolson, as Administrator of B.A.C. Administrative District Council of New Jersey and Defendant KF Stucco, Inc. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Katharine S. Hayden on 3/30/2015. (nr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
