PREZIOSO v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
ALEXANDER N. PREZIOSO |
BAYER CORPORATION and MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT |
2:2014cv03140 |
May 16, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Morris |
Stanley R. Chesler |
Cathy L. Waldor |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 94 OPINION. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 06/20/2018. (ek) |
Filing 50 OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 45 Application/Motion to Compel. The Court will hold a teleconference, to be initiated by Defendants and with in-house counsel for Defendant Bayer to be on the call, on December 19, 2016 at 4:30 PM to discuss scheduling of disclosures and remand consistent with this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor on 12/8/16. (sr, )(N/M via cert. mail Pltf. #7011 2000 0002 0927 1453) |
Filing 35 OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Remand. This case is REMANDED to the plan committee to complete the recordand to review Plaintiffs claim for benefits based upon the completed record. Defendants shall complete this review within 45 calendar days of the date of entry of this Order; and this case is STAYED pending completion of this review. The parties shall report to the Court in writing with the result of the appeal review within 50 calendar days of the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 1/21/16. (sr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.