LOCKETT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
| MOSES B LOCKETT |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ROBERT BUECHELE |
| 2:2015cv01196 |
| February 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Jose L. Linares |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM/ORDER REOPENING CASE; that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1) as amended by Petitioners request to reopen (ECF No. 5) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; that Petitioner is granted leave to amend his petition to provide sufficient factual bases to support his claims within thirty (30) days; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail and shall CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 5/26/15. (DD, )
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM/ORDER REOPENING CASE; that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. I) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;that Petitioner is granted leave to amend his petition to provide sufficientfactual bases to support his claims within thirty (30) days; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff by regular U.S. mail and shall CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Jose L. Linares on 4/20/15. (DD, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
