LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. v. ACTIONLINK, LLC
Plaintiff: LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Defendant: ACTIONLINK, LLC
Case Number: 2:2015cv05472
Filed: July 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Madeline C. Arleo
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Hammer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION. Signed by Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 10/30/15. (cm )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. v. ACTIONLINK, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Represented By: ERIC K. BLUMENFELD
Represented By: WILFRED P. CORONATO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTIONLINK, LLC
Represented By: CHARLES R. COHEN
Represented By: ALEX ANTHONY PISAREVSKY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?