IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. et al
Plaintiff: IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant: ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. and ACTAVIS PHARMA INC.
Case Number: 2:2015cv06934
Filed: September 17, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Morris
Presiding Judge: Katharine S. Hayden
Presiding Judge: Cathy L. Waldor
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 192 AMENDED OPINION/ORDER that Actavis motion for summary judgment of noninfringement (Docket Entry No. 142), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 4/18/18. (DD, )
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 180 OPINION/ORDER granting in part and denying in part 142 Motion for Summary Judgment; that Actavis is barred from using its two-range calculation theory as adefense against infringement of the claims with a 40% fluctuation limitation. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 3/8/18. (DD, )
May 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 118 OPINION/ORDER re: construction of claims in U.S. Patent No. 8,377,474 (the 474 patent). Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/9/17. (DD, )
May 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 OPINION/ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion to Stay; that Impax shall provide the Court with status updates regarding the ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,094,427, every sixty (60) days starting June 17, 2016; that Impax shall notify the Court within ten (10) days of any disposition of the ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 7,094,427. Signed by Judge Stanley R. Chesler on 5/26/16. (DD, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. v. ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC.
Represented By: MICHAEL E. PATUNAS
Represented By: MAYRA VELEZ TARANTINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC.
Represented By: HECTOR DANIEL RUIZ
Represented By: READE WILLIAM SELIGMANN
Represented By: LIZA M. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA INC.
Represented By: HECTOR DANIEL RUIZ
Represented By: READE WILLIAM SELIGMANN
Represented By: LIZA M. WALSH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?