HIGH CREST FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE, LLC et al v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC. et al
HIGH CREST FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE, LLC, IMMUNOGEN DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, MICHAEL SEGAL, M.D. and NEELENDU BOSE |
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, INC. and MERCK & CO., INC. |
2:2015cv08876 |
December 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Essex |
Madeline C. Arleo |
Leda D. Wettre |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 246 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 231 MOTION to Dismiss and 243 application to voluntarily withdraw. Objections, if any, to R&R due by 9/11/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 8/28/2019. (byl) |
Filing 166 LETTER OPINION/ORDER granting 158 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney BRIAN C. BROOK terminated; that plaintiffs High Crest Functional Medicine, LLC,Immunogen Diagnostics, LLC, Michael Segal, and Neelendu Bose, shall appear by new counsel on or before October 27, 2017 or deem them pro se. Accordingly, the entity plaintiffs must appear by new counsel by October 27, 2017, or will be subject to default; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 10/3/17. (DD, ) |
Filing 117 MEMORANDUM OPINION/ORDER granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 3/30/17. (DD, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.