KING v. JOHNSON et al
Petitioner: GEORGE KING
Respondent: STEPHEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Case Number: 2:2016cv00654
Filed: January 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Kevin McNulty
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 OPINION. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 5/1/17. (DD, ) N/M
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM/ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall serve, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Habeas Rules, a Notice of Electronic Filing of this Order on the State of New Jersey, Department of Law & Public Safety, Division of Criminal Justice, Appellate Bu reau (the Bureau), in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between this Court and the Bureau; that if a Motion to Dismiss is filed, Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days to file an opposition brief, in which Petitioner may argue any ba ses for statutory and/or equitable tolling, and to which Petitioner may attach any relevant exhibits; that if Petitioner files an opposition, Respondents shall have len (10) days to file a reply brief; that if the Motion to Dismiss is subsequently d enied, the Court will then direct Respondents to file a full and complete answer to all claims; that Petitioner may file and serve a reply to the answer within forty-five (45) days after Respondents tile the answer, see Habeas Rule 5(e); etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 8/23/16. N/M(DD, )
February 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM/ORDER that the Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this case. Petitioner is informed that administrative termination is not a dismissal for purposes of the statute of limitations; that the Clerks provision of the blank h abeas petition form shall not be construed as this Courts finding that the original petition is or is not timely; that if petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order; that the Clerk of the Court shall serve upon petitioner by regular U.S. mail:(1) a copy of this Memorandum and Order; (2) a blank habeas petition formAO 241 (modified): DNJ-Habeas-008 (Rev.01-2014); and (3) a blank form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner in a habeas case; etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 2/10/16. (DD, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KING v. JOHNSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GEORGE KING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STEPHEN JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?