BAGBY v. HOOPER
GEORGE E. BAGBY |
KEITH HOOPER |
2:2016cv00686 |
February 9, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Hudson |
Michael A. Hammer |
Kevin McNulty |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35 Report and Recommendations; dismissing action for failure to prosecute ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 1/11/18. (DD, ) N/M |
Filing 8 Letter Opinion/Order denying 5 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono filed by GEORGE E. BAGBY.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer on 3/16/16. (DD, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BAGBY v. HOOPER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: GEORGE E. BAGBY | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: KEITH HOOPER | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.