NIBLACK v. MIGLIO et al
STANLEY L. NIBLACK |
ANNA MIGLIO, CHRISTY RALPH, JAMES MCDONNELL, JAMES HUNSICKER, JONATHON HINSON, WILLIE BONDS, ALEXANDER SOLANIK, TURNER, JOHN POWELL, CHARLES RAY HUGHES, KENYA COLLINS, KENNETH NELSON and GARY M. LANIGAN |
2:2016cv00747 |
February 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Essex |
Madeline C. Arleo |
Leda D. Wettre |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff Niblack's 82 informal motion to compel is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Plaintiff Niblack's motion to compel responses to requests for admissions is denied for the reasons stated on the record, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 02/20/2018. (ek) |
Filing 55 LETTER OPINION-ORDER: Plaintiff's request for leave to file a motion to compel is denied without prejudice; Defendant Ralph and Solaniks request that the Court accept written deposition responses in lieu of interrogatory responses is denied without prejudice; Fact Discovery due by 8/31/2017, etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 04/28/2017. (ek) |
Filing 43 OPINION. Signed by Judge Madeline C. Arleo on 02/28/2017. (ek) |
Filing 18 LETTER ORDER/OPINION denying 14 Appeal Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 8/16/2016. (seb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.