GREENGRASS v. PROVIDENT BANK
Plaintiff: GLADYS T. GREENGRASS
Defendant: PROVIDENT BANK
Case Number: 2:2016cv04105
Filed: July 12, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Claire C. Cecchi
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss, to the extent the deficiencies in Plaintiffs claims can be cured by wayof amendment, Plaintiff is granted 30 days to reinstate this matter upon the filing of an Amended Complaint ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 8/25/17. (sr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GREENGRASS v. PROVIDENT BANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GLADYS T. GREENGRASS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PROVIDENT BANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?