MERILAN v. RODRIGUEZ
| ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ and nefpsKM |
| JUDE MERILAN |
| 2:2016cv05874 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Union |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM/ORDER TO ANSWER that the Clerk shall serve a copy of the petition (Dkt. No. 1) and this Order upon respondent Rodriguez by regular mail, with all costs of service advanced by the United States; that the Clerk shall forward a copy of the petition (Dkt. No. 1) and this Order to the Chief, Civil Division, United States Attorneys Office, at the following email address: USANJ-HabeasCases@usdoj.gov; that within thirty (30) days of the date of the entry of this Order, respondent sh all file and serve an answer which responds to the allegations and grounds in the petition and which includes all affirmative defenses respondent seeks to invoke, in addition to any other arguments respondent may make; that within thirty (30) da ys of receipt of the answer, petitioner may file a reply to the answer; that within seven (7) days of petitioners release, by parole or otherwise, respondent shall electronically file a written notice of the same with the Clerk; etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 9/29/16. (DD, ) N/M
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
