ONG et al v. SUPERIOR COURT OF HUDSON COUNTY et al
JOHANNA ONG and BEVERLY ONG |
SUPERIOR COURT OF HUDSON COUNTY, PROSECUTOR OFFICE OF SUPERIOR COURT OF HUDSON COUNTY, SHERIFF OFFICE OF SUPERIOR COURT OF HUDSON COUNTY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER, TRENTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL and JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL COURT |
2:2016cv06777 |
October 7, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Hudson |
James B. Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 OPINION. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 01/08/2018. (ek) |
Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Plaintiffs' 39 Motion for Protective Order; Denying 40 Motion Opposing for another Extension of Time against Defendants; Denying 41 Motion for Default Judgment ; Denying 42 Motion for Reentry of Statement of Claims Injuries and Relief; Denying 43 Motion to Remove Attorney Matthew Eric Blackman from this case. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 06/13/2017. (ek) (Main Document 44 replaced on 6/13/2017) (nic). |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 29 Motion Opposing for another Extension of Time; Denying 30 Motion for Default Judgment ; Denying 28 Motion for Issuance of an Order of Protection and Motion for Issuance of Permanent No Contact Order, etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 06/05/2017. (ek) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.