ARMSTRONG v. UNION COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
QUADIR ARMSTRONG |
UNION COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J GARCIA, J MENDES, J MARIS, M PEREZ, RONALD CHARLES and UNION COUNTY NEW JERSEY |
2:2016cv07082 |
October 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Union |
Claire C. Cecchi |
James B. Clark |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER denying application for Pro Bono Counsel. Motions terminated: 2 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono filed by QUADIR ARMSTRONG. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 06/14/2017. (ek) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that all claims against Defendants Union County, Union County Department of Corrections, and Ronald Charles are dismissed w/out prejudice, and the Clerk shall file the Complaint and issue summons. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis application, ECF No. 1-3, is denied, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), Defendants shall file and serve an answer, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 2(a)( 1 )(A). Upon proper service of process by Plaintiff at any time prior to the filing of a not ice of appearance by Defendants, Plaintiff files an amended complaint, or seeks the appointment of pro bono counsel or other relief, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a) and (d), Plaintiff shall (1) serve a copy of the filing by regular mail upon each party at his last known address and (2) file a Certificate of Service; etc. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 1/4/17. (sr, )(N/M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.