DEMOS v. UNITED HEALTH GROUP et al
| DEMOS and JOHN ROBERT DEMOS |
| UNITED HEALTH GROUP, CIGNA CORP., HUMANA INC., AETNA INC., CENTENE CORP., HARTFORD HEALTH CARE CORP., WELL CARE HEALTH PLANS INC., HCA HOLDINGS INC., MOLLINA HEALTH CARE INC. and HEALTH NET INC. |
| 2:2016cv08861 |
| November 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Mark Falk |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Anti-Trust |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1337 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, and the Clerk shall close the file w/out filing the complaint or assessing fees. If Plaintiff wishes to reopen this action, he shall so notify the Court within 45 days of the date of entry of this Order, in writing addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, NJ 07101; and Plaintiffs writing shall include the filing fee. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 12/30/16. (sr, )(N/M)
|
| Filing 2 OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 12/30/16. (sr, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (sr, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint Received. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(cm ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
