ROGERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
| THOMAS ROGERS |
| STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MAN WITH NJ STATE TROOPER ID 7789 |
| 2:2016cv08870 |
| November 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Mercer |
| James B. Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 49 Motion to Recusal, and dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint w/prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 4/4/18. (sr, )(N/M via certified mail #7011 3500 0000 6746 2422)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION & ORDER granting 41 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the State of New Jersey. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to Trooper Porch. If he so chooses , Plaintiff has thirty (30) days in which to file a second amended complaint, consistent with this Opinion and Order, as to Trooper Porch. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint within thirty days, the matter as to Trooper Porch will be dismissed with prejudice; etc. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 2/8/18. (sr, )
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 7/18/17. (sr, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
