KAETZ v. EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION et al
| WILLIAM F. KAETZ |
| EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, EXPERIAN, TRANSUNION and EQUIFAX |
| 2:2016cv09225 |
| December 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Claire C. Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
155
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 147 Motion to Set Aside Judgment; denying 147 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Judge Evelyn Padin on 1/24/2024. (lag, )
|
|
Filing
121
OPINION & ORDER denying 101 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 6/30/2020. (jl, )
|
|
Filing
99
OPINION. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 9/30/2019. (ams, )
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion to reopen, (ECF No. 46) is hereby Granted, it i further Ordered that the Clerk of Court shall Reopen this matter by making a new and separate docket entry reading "Civil Case Reopen". It is further Ordere d that Motion 47 for Default Judgment is hereby Denied and that 42 Motion to Dismiss, and 44 Motion to Dismiss ; are administratively terminated as moot, and It is further Ordered that Plaintiff's request to amend Plaintiff's amended Complaint (ECF No. 48), is hereby Granted; etc. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 11/9/2017. (JB, )
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION. Signed by Judge Claire C. Cecchi on 9/11/2017. (JB, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
