GOULD v. O'NEAL et al
JONATHAN GOULD |
ROBERT O'NEAL, JOHN CAMPO and ROBERT GRADY |
2:2017cv00100 |
January 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Essex |
James B. Clark |
John Michael Vazquez |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 2/7/2022. (bt) |
Filing 92 OPINION & ORDER denying 88 Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andre M. Espinosa on 5/12/2021. (bt, ) |
Filing 71 OPINION AND ORDER; granting 57 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; Chase shall bear its own costs; and Chase's forthcoming production to Plaintiff shall include a privilege log; etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 9/26/2019. (sms) |
Filing 50 OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendant's 34 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's complaint as to Defendant Robert Grady; DIMISSING with prejudice Plaintiff's 32 First Amended Complaint as to Defendant Robert Grady, etc. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 07/17/2018. (ek) |
Filing 30 OPINION. Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 2/8/18. (sr, ) |
Filing 21 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Vacate. Robert Grady's answer shall be filed within 10 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge James B. Clark on 7/19/17. (sr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.