PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC
Defendant: ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
Case Number: 2:2017cv00536
Filed: January 26, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Hammer
Presiding Judge: Kevin McNulty
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28:1132
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 9/11/17. (DD, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC
Represented By: JORDAN BRANSON DASCAL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
Represented By: AMANDA LYN GENOVESE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?