PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC |
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD |
2:2017cv00536 |
January 26, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Bergen |
Michael A. Hammer |
Kevin McNulty |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 OPINION. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 9/11/17. (DD, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PROGRESSIVE SPINE & ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC | |
Represented By: | JORDAN BRANSON DASCAL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD | |
Represented By: | AMANDA LYN GENOVESE |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.