DAVIS v. UNIVERSITY PRIMETIME, LLC et al
| HAROLD DAVIS |
| JASON I OLEPHANT, UNIVERSITY PRIMETIME, UNIVERSITY PRIMETIME, LLC and JASON I. OLEPHANT |
| 2:2017cv07304 |
| September 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Passaic |
| Joseph A Dickson |
| Jose L Linares |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), w/prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Jose L. Linares on 2/1/18. (DD, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by HAROLD DAVIS (ASHRAFZADEH-KIAN, JOHAN) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to JASON I. OLEPHANT, UNIVERSITY PRIMETIME, LLC Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *Shea Smith* (sms) |
| Filing 2 AO121 Copyright Form filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A-E) (sms) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Jose L. Linares and Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Dickson. (ak, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JASON I OLEPHANT, UNIVERSITY PRIMETIME ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8103323) with JURY DEMAND, filed by HAROLD DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-E)(ASHRAFZADEH-KIAN, JOHAN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
