AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC v. FRANCESCA JEAN-BAPTISTE
Plaintiff: AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC
Defendant: FRANCESCA JEAN-BAPTISTE
Case Number: 2:2017cv11962
Filed: November 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Madeline Cox Arleo
Presiding Judge: Michael A. Hammer
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 9 U.S.C. ยง 9
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION. Signed by Judge Madeline Cox Arleo on 7/13/2018. (sm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC v. FRANCESCA JEAN-BAPTISTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC
Represented By: KEITH J. ROSENBLATT
Represented By: SCOTT CRAIG SILVERMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANCESCA JEAN-BAPTISTE
Represented By: RONALD J. WRONKO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?