DAVIS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
Plaintiff: CHARLES DAVIS
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
In Re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Case Number: 2:2018cv11036
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Claire C Cecchi
Referring Judge: Mark Falk
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2018 Filing 6 Short-Form ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND with Certificate of Service by ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP.(HINDY, GREGORY)
July 26, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHARLES DAVIS. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP served on 7/5/2018, answer due 7/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(RASMUSSEN, B. KRISTIAN)
July 26, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CHARLES DAVIS. ASTRAZENECA LP served on 7/5/2018, answer due 7/26/2018. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(RASMUSSEN, B. KRISTIAN)
June 27, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by JOEL THOMAS CALDWELL on behalf of CHARLES DAVIS (CALDWELL, JOEL)
June 27, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *Gail A. Hansen* (gh, )
June 27, 2018 Member Case Direct File on 6/26/18, for MDL 2789 PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II) (gh, )
June 27, 2018 For all Case Management Orders #click here (gh, )
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8840483) with JURY DEMAND, filed by CHARLES DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RASMUSSEN, B. KRISTIAN)
June 26, 2018 Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk added. (gh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA LP
Represented By: GREGORY JOSEPH HINDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Represented By: GREGORY JOSEPH HINDY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES DAVIS
Represented By: B. KRISTIAN RASMUSSEN
Represented By: JOEL THOMAS CALDWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?