TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS v. KARIO CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS
Defendant: KARIO CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Case Number: 2:2018cv11059
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Referring Judge: John Michael Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2018 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Kario Construction Corp. for failure to plead or otherwise defend. (ld, )
July 23, 2018 Filing 6 Request for Default by TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS against Kario Construction Corp.. (AREMAN, MATTHEW)
July 12, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS. (AREMAN, MATTHEW)
July 11, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS. KARIO CONSTRUCTION CORP. served on 6/29/2018, answer due 8/28/2018. (AREMAN, MATTHEW)
July 11, 2018 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Summons Returned Executed as to USA document number #4 filed by MATTHEW AREMAN on 07/11/2018 was submitted incorrectly as a Summons Returned Executed as to USA. PLEASE RESUBMIT THE Summons Returned Executed as to USA USING Summons Returned Executed. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (ek)
June 26, 2018 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS. (AREMAN, MATTHEW)
June 26, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to KARIO CONSTRUCTION CORP. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *Farrell Patterson* (fp, )
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kario Construction Corp. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8841354), filed by TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Disclosure Statement, #3 Summons)(AREMAN, MATTHEW)
June 26, 2018 Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk. (jr)
June 26, 2018 CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Matthew Aremon on 6/26/2018 was submitted with a Corporate Disclosure Statement as an attachment. PLEASE RESUBMIT the Corporate Disclosure Statement USING the event CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT found under Other Filings -> Other Documents. (fp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS v. KARIO CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL 780 BENEFIT FUNDS
Represented By: MATTHEW D. AREMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KARIO CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?