DILULLO et al v. BROUMAND et al
Plaintiff: THOMAS F DILULLO and THOMAS F. DILULLO, PC
Defendant: ABC COMPANY AND/OR CORPORATIONS 1 TO 5 (FICTITIOUS ENTITIES), LANCE BROUMAND, URBANDADDY, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 TO 10 (FICTITIOUS PERSONS)
Case Number: 2:2018cv11073
Filed: June 26, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Office: Newark Office
County: Bergen
Presiding Judge: Mark Falk
Referring Judge: John Michael Vazquez
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 6/28/2018. (ld, )
June 28, 2018 ***Civil Case Terminated. (ld, )
June 27, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (DILULLO, THOMAS)
June 27, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to LANCE BROUMAND, URBANDADDY, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. Issued By *John Reilly* (jr)
June 27, 2018 Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk. (jr)
June 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8842062), filed by THOMAS F DILULLO, THOMAS F. DILULLO, PC, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION.(DILULLO, THOMAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DILULLO et al v. BROUMAND et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABC COMPANY AND/OR CORPORATIONS 1 TO 5 (FICTITIOUS ENTITIES)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LANCE BROUMAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: URBANDADDY, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1 TO 10 (FICTITIOUS PERSONS)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS F DILULLO
Represented By: THOMAS FRANCIS DILULLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: THOMAS F. DILULLO, PC
Represented By: THOMAS FRANCIS DILULLO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?