KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. VISUAL ACOUSTICS
KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS as successor to NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS and THE TRUSTEES THEREOF and KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS |
VISUAL ACOUSTICS |
2:2018cv11733 |
July 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Bergen |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Leda D Wettre |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
9 U.S.C. ยง 9 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration award . Motion set for 8/20/2018 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (ld, ) |
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS as successor to NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS and THE TRUSTEES THEREOF. (PARSONS, BRADLEY) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration award by KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS as successor to NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS and THE TRUSTEES THEREOF. (Attachments: #1 STATEMENT, #2 ORDER, #3 JUDGMENT, #4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE)(PARSONS, BRADLEY) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Arbitration Award ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8888729.), filed by KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS as successor to NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS and THE TRUSTEES THEREOF. (Attachments: #1 COVER LETTER, #2 CIVIL COVER SHEET)(PARSONS, BRADLEY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. VISUAL ACOUSTICS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: VISUAL ACOUSTICS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS as successor to NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS and THE TRUSTEES THEREOF | |
Represented By: | BRADLEY MARK PARSONS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS | |
Represented By: | BRADLEY MARK PARSONS |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.