URIBE v. MATTHEWS DINER INC. et al
| ROSALIO URIBE |
| SAM MATTHEWS and MATTHEWS DINER INC. |
| 2:2018cv12545 |
| August 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Bergen |
| Katharine S Hayden |
| Cathy L Waldor |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by ROSALIO URIBE Consent Form (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by VIVIANNA A. MORALES on behalf of ROSALIO URIBE (MORALES, VIVIANNA) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROSALIO URIBE. MATTHEWS DINER INC. served on 8/14/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ROSALIO URIBE. SAM MATTHEWS served on 8/14/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. (PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by CATALINA CADAVID on behalf of ROSALIO URIBE (CADAVID, CATALINA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to SAM MATTHEWS, MATTHEWS DINER INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (sm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAM MATTHEWS, MATTHEWS DINER INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8939701), filed by ROSALIO URIBE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed Summons)(PECHMAN, LOUIS) |
| Judge Katharine S. Hayden and Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor added. (eu, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.