PAQUETTE v. PINNACLE FOODS INC. et al
| Robert H. Paquette |
| JANE NIELSEN, PINNACLE FOODS INC., ANN FANDOZZI, MARK JUNG, MUKTESH PANT, MARK CLOUSE, ROGER DEROMEDI, Raymond P. Silcock and IOANNIS SKOUFALOS |
| 2:2018cv12578 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Newark Office |
| Morris |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
OPINION AND ORDER, Case No. 2:18-cv-12578 and 2:18-cv-12610 are CONSOLIDATED under the first-filed case, Case No. 2:18-cv-12501; The Clerk of Court shall establish a Master Docket and Master File under Case No. 2:18-cv-12501. All orders, pleadings, motions and other documents shall, when filed and docketed in the Master File, be deemed filed and docketed in each individual case to the extent applicable; Counsel for the parties shall assist the Court by notifying the Clerk of this Court the filing or transfer of any case that might properly be consolidated as part of this consolidated action; etc. Signed by Judge William J. Martini on 09/12/2018. (sms)
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (sms) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting #6 Letter by STEVENS, NICHOLAS requesting Pro Hac Vice admission of Richard H. Baron, Esq., etc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark Falk on 8/29/2018. (JB, )
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' "Stipulation as to Revised Briefing" (ECF No. 5), which suggests that the parties may extend the briefing schedule for the pending motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 3) by two motion cycles without the permission of the Court. The parties apparently have not reviewed the Local Civil Rules for the District of New Jersey and do not adequately comprehend motion practice in this Court. Local Rule 7.1(d)(5) provides that an opposing party to a motion may adjourn the motion date one cycle without the permission of its adversary or the Court; however, any further extension must be granted by the Court at the request of the party seeking the extension. See Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(5). Any such extension request may be made by filing a letter indicating the desired motion date, the parties' consent and the reasons underlying the request. Consequently, the Court treats the parties' instant "Stipulation" as an automatic extension under Rule 7.1(d)(5). The new motion date for the pending motion for a preliminary injunction is October 1, 2018. Defendants' opposition is due no later September 17, 2018 and Plaintiff's reply is due no later than September 24, 2018. Should the parties wish to extend the motion cycle further, they must file the appropriate letter to the Court, explaining their reasons for the extension. So Ordered by Judge William J. Martini on 8/29/18. (gh, )
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . Responses due by 9/17/2018 Replies due by 9/24/2018. Motion set for 10/1/2018 before Judge William J. Martini. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. (gh, ) |
| Filing 6 Letter. (Attachments: #1 Certification of N. Stevens, #2 Certification of R. Baron, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(STEVENS, NICHOLAS) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION re Set/Reset Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings, #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by All Defendants. (STEVENS, NICHOLAS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by NICHOLAS STEVENS on behalf of All Defendants (STEVENS, NICHOLAS) |
| Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . Motion set for 9/17/2018 before Judge William J. Martini. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (JB, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by ROBERT H. PAQUETTE. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Declaration of Susana Cruz Hodge, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(CRUZ HODGE, SUSANA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to MARK CLOUSE, ROGER DEROMEDI, ANN FANDOZZI, MARK JUNG, JANE NIELSEN, MUKTESH PANT, PINNACLE FOODS INC., IOANNIS SKOUFALOS, RAYMOND P. SILCOCK. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-8942749) with JURY DEMAND, filed by Robert H. Paquette. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(CRUZ HODGE, SUSANA) |
| Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk added. (eu, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
