500 PARK AVENUE E.O., NJ. INC. v. DEY-EL
| 500 PARK AVENUE E.O., NJ. INC. |
| CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL |
| 2:2018cv13048 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 USCA Case Number 18-3180 for #5 Notice of Appeal (USCA) filed by CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL. USCA Case Manager Kirsi (Document Restricted - Court Only) (ca3kr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #3 Order of Dismissal, by CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(dam, ) |
| Filing 4 Transmittal Letter for remanded case to Essex County Veterans Courthouse50 West Market StreetNewark, NJ 07102 State No: ESX-L-05567-14. Mailed certified copy of the Order remanding case. (JB, ) |
Filing 3
OPINION AND ORDER, that Defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis is Granted and it is further Ordered that the Clerk's office shall close this case; and it is further Ordered that the Clerk of the Court mail a copy of the Opinion and Order to Defendant by regular mail and by Certified mail return receipt. (RRR-7011-2000-0002-1065-3392). Signed by Judge John Michael Vazquez on 8/28/2018. (JB, )
|
| Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION for More Definite Statement. Motion set for 9/17/2018 before Judge John Michael Vazquez. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (JB, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY THE EVICTION / EMERGENT RELIEF by CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL. (JB, ) Modified on 8/27/2018 (ro). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL from Essex County, case number ESX-L-5567-14., received by CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL. (Attachments: #1 Second part of removal, #2 Affidavit of statement of facts, #3 Motion / Certificate in support of motion to vacate final judgment, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Notice of Motion, #9 Application IFP, #10 Text of Proposed Order, #11 Non-consent to receive service electronically, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(lag, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: 500 PARK AVENUE E.O., NJ. INC. v. DEY-EL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CRYSTAL FENTY DEY-EL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: 500 PARK AVENUE E.O., NJ. INC. | |
| Represented By: | LISA HENDRICKS RICHARDSON |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
