LAMPLEY v. WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION et al
| GEORGE H. LAMPLEY, JR |
| TOM JENNINGS, JR, TOM FALLON, CHUCKIE OMORA, WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION and JOE NICHOLS |
| 2:2018cv13327 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant Wakefern Food Corporation. Attorney JENNIFER A. RYGIEL-BOYD for WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION added. (RYGIEL-BOYD, JENNIFER) |
| Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/2/2018. (JB, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TOM FALLON, TOM JENNINGS, JR, JOE NICHOLS, CHUCKIE OMORA, WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TOM FALLON, TOM JENNINGS, JR, JOE NICHOLS, CHUCKIE OMORA, WAKEFERN FOOD CORPORATION ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number NEW037240) with JURY DEMAND, filed by GEORGE H. LAMPLEY, JR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lag, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
