STELLACIE et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
| QUIT STELLACIE and JAMES STELLACIE |
| C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD MEDICAL DIVISION |
| 2:2018cv13898 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Michael A Hammer |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark: Case transferred from New Jersey has been opened in Southern District of Ohio as case 2:18-cv-01292, filed 10/23/2018. (gh, ) |
Filing 3
Order of MDL Panel transferring case to the Southern District of Ohio.(CTO-9 MDL2846 Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.) (gh, )
|
| Case extracted via ECF to the Southern District of Ohio. (gh, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to BARD MEDICAL DIVISION, C.R. BARD, INC.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BARD MEDICAL DIVISION, C.R. BARD, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9024683) with JURY DEMAND, filed by JAMES STELLACIE, QUIT STELLACIE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed)(FARNOLO, NICHOLAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
