COHNEN v. TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A. et al
KEVIN COHNEN |
JOHN DOES 1-25 and TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A. |
2:2018cv13961 |
September 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Steven C Mannion |
Susan D Wigenton |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #5 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 11/16/2018. (mfr) |
Filing 5 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Plaintiff's Complaint.. (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by LAWRENCE J. BARTEL, III on behalf of TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A. (BARTEL, LAWRENCE) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by KEVIN COHNEN. TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A. served on 10/12/2018, answer due 11/2/2018. (SAKS, YAAKOV) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A.. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (fp, ) |
Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion added. (eu, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JOHN DOES 1-25, TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9029639) with JURY DEMAND, filed by KEVIN COHNEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SAKS, YAAKOV) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.