RAPEIKA v. ROBINSON et al
ONN RAPEIKA |
ADMINISTRATOR GEORGE ROBINSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
2:2018cv14150 |
September 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Newark Office |
Susan D Wigenton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERED that Petitioner's habeas petition is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ; Petitioner is DENIED a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE the case, etc. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 9/27/2018. (gl, ) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 9/27/2018. (gl, ) |
Filing 2 Clerk's Letter: Attorney is not admitted to the Federal Bar of New Jersey. Notice has been mailed to the attorney's address. (gl, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number NEW037461.), filed by ONN RAPEIKA. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(gl, ) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - As of May 1, 2006, Civil initial pleadings such as complaints and notices of removal must be filed electronically. Visit our website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for additional information. In the future, to expedite the processing of the initial pleadings, counsel is requested to file complaints and notices of removal electronically. (gl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.