WONG et al v. LUBETKIN et al
| JAY L. LUBETKIN and QUINCY WONG |
| GRACE WONG |
| 40 LAKEVIEW DRIVE, LLC |
| 2:2018cv14201 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose L Linares |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER, that the Appellee's #2 Motion to dismiss the appeal is ADMINISTRATELY TERMINATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; etc. Signed by Chief Judge Jose L. Linares on 10/22/2018. (sms)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Appeal For Lack Of Standing by JAY L. LUBETKIN. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Brief, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(LESNIK, LAWRENCE) |
| Set Deadlines as to #2 MOTION to Dismiss Appeal For Lack Of Standing. Motion set for 11/19/2018 before Chief Judge Jose L. Linares. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. Bankruptcy Court case number 15-14692, filed by GRACE WONG. (Attachments: #1 Order being Appealed, #2 Transmittal Letter)(sms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
