PARK v. PRYNT CORPORATION et al
| SUNGHO PARK |
| CLEMENT PERROT and PRYNT CORPORATION |
| 2:2018cv14474 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Steven C Mannion |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CLEMENT PERROT, PRYNT CORPORATION. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (lag, ) |
| Filing 3 Request for Summons to be Issued by Sungho Park as to All Defendants. (KIMM, MICHAEL) Modified on 10/1/2018 (lag, ). |
| Filing 2 Exhibit to #1 Complaint by Sungho Park. (KIMM, MICHAEL) Modified on 10/1/2018 (lag, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by Sungho Park.(KIMM, MICHAEL) Modified on 10/1/2018 (lag, ). |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Party Information, Names changed to match the complaint. . The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (lag, ) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion. (jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
