PADUA v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC
CLARIBEL PADUA |
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC |
2:2018cv14815 |
October 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Steven C Mannion |
Susan D Wigenton |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. ***CIVIL CASE TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 11/27/2018. (sms) |
Filing 6 Amendment to Claim, Exhibit A to #4 Application/Petition by CLARIBEL PADUA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 1st and 2nd Attachments)(sms) |
Filing 5 ORDER, granting #4 Plaintiff's application for an extension of time to respond to Defendants' Motion to dismiss, is extended to November 16, 2018; etc. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 11/8/2018. (sms) |
Filing 4 Application/Petition for an extension of time to respond to dispositive motion D.E. #3 ; filed by CLARIBEL PADUA. (sms) |
Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 11/19/2018 before Judge Susan D. Wigenton. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms) |
Set Deadlines as to #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion set for 11/19/2018 before Judge Susan D. Wigenton. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sm) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC. Responses due by 11/5/2018 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(KOWAL, DOROTHY) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC identifying Experian plc as Corporate Parent.. (KOWAL, DOROTHY) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC from SUPERIOR COURT NJ UNION COUNTY LAW DIVISION SPECIAL CIVIL PART, case number UNN-DC-11953-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9082361), filed by EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(KOWAL, DOROTHY) |
Judge Susan D. Wigenton and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion added. (eu, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PADUA v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC | |
Represented By: | DOROTHY A. KOWAL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CLARIBEL PADUA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.