HOLMES v. GRAND ESSEX, LLC et al
| ARIEL D. HOLMES |
| YITZY ELBAUM, CHAIM ROTTENBERG, FRED SCHONFELD, JERSEY GLATT, INC. and GRAND ESSEX, LLC |
| 2:2018cv15011 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ARIEL D. HOLMES. YITZY ELBAUM waiver sent on 10/16/2018, answer due 12/17/2018; GRAND ESSEX, LLC waiver sent on 10/16/2018, answer due 12/17/2018; JERSEY GLATT, INC. waiver sent on 10/16/2018, answer due 12/17/2018; CHAIM ROTTENBERG waiver sent on 10/16/2018, answer due 12/17/2018; FRED SCHONFELD waiver sent on 10/16/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (COHEN, JOHNMACK) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to YITZY ELBAUM, GRAND ESSEX, LLC, JERSEY GLATT, INC., CHAIM ROTTENBERG, FRED SCHONFELD. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against YITZY ELBAUM, GRAND ESSEX, LLC, JERSEY GLATT, INC., CHAIM ROTTENBERG, FRED SCHONFELD ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9097951) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ARIEL D. HOLMES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(COHEN, JOHNMACK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
