SONGG v. PATERSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
| PRISCILLA SONGG |
| PATERSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF PATERSON, OFFICER J. JOHNSON, COUNTY OF PASSAIC, OFFICER ROBERT SHIREY, OFFICER CULMAN ID#4785 and JOHN DOES #1-30 |
| 2:2018cv16117 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Mark Falk |
| William J Martini |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to CITY OF PATERSON, COUNTY OF PASSAIC, OFFICER CULMAN ID#4785, OFFICER J. JOHNSON, PATERSON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER ROBERT SHIREY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
| Case assigned to Judge William J. Martini and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk. (jr) |
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The Complaint #1 submitted by Nima Ameri on 11/13/2018 contains an improper signature. Only the filing user is permitted to sign electronically filed documents with an s/(attorney's name). PLEASE RESUBMIT THE DOCUMENT WITH A PROPER SIGNATURE. Call the Help Desk if you have any questions. This submission will remain on the docket unless otherwise ordered by the court. (jr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9169198) with JURY DEMAND, filed by PRISCILLA SONGG.(AMERI, NIMA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
