FOGWELL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
SUSAN FOGWELL |
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. |
2:2018cv16230 |
November 16, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Madeline Cox Arleo |
Michael A Hammer |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) the Complaint. Motion set for 2/4/2019 before Judge Madeline Cox Arleo. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (sms) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) the Complaint by UNITED AIRLINES, INC.. Responses due by 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, #2 Certification of Suzanne M. Cerra, Esq., #3 Exhibit A to Certification of Suzanne M. Cerra, Esq., #4 Exhibit B to Certification of Suzanne M. Cerra, Esq., #5 Text of Proposed Order, #6 Certificate of Service)(CERRA, SUZANNE) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by ETHAN G. ISAAC on behalf of UNITED AIRLINES, INC. (ISAAC, ETHAN) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #6 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by UNITED AIRLINES, INC. has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 01/03/2019. (sms) |
Filing 6 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant United Airlines, Inc... (CERRA, SUZANNE) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UNITED AIRLINES, INC. identifying United Continental Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent.. (CERRA, SUZANNE) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by SUZANNE M. CERRA on behalf of All Defendants (CERRA, SUZANNE) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Breon Thompson on 11/29/2018, filed by SUSAN FOGWELL. (SIEGLER, STEVEN) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (jr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED AIRLINES, INC. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9178076) with JURY DEMAND, filed by SUSAN FOGWELL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SIEGLER, STEVEN) |
Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: FOGWELL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. | |
Represented By: | ETHAN G. ISAAC |
Represented By: | SUZANNE M. CERRA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SUSAN FOGWELL | |
Represented By: | STEVEN SIEGLER |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.