MOORE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
| LARRY MOORE |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, PFIZER INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERCA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY LIMITED, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. |
| PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II) |
| 2:2018cv16480 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion filed by ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY re #3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss For Failure To Provide Proof Of Injury And/Or Proof Of Use After Tolling Expiration, #5 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure To Provide Proof Of Injury And/Or Proof Of Use After Tolling Expiration And To Plaintiffs Response In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (HINDY, GREGORY) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by SHAYNA E. SACKS on behalf of LARRY MOORE (SACKS, SHAYNA) |
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Dismiss For Failure To Provide Proof Of Injury And/Or Proof Of Use After Tolling Expiration by ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH, INC., PFIZER, INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. Responses due by 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service) [**Motion previously filed in the Master Docket in error**](jl, ) |
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION to Dismiss For Failure To Provide Proof Of Injury And/Or Proof Of Use After Tolling Expiration by All Defendants. Responses due by 1/22/2019 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service)(BROWN, LOREN) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PFIZER INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERCA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (gh, ) |
| Member Case Direct File on 11/27/18, for MDL 2789PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II) (gh, ) |
| Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk added. (gh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PFIZER INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERCA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANY LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9197458) with JURY DEMAND, filed by LARRY MOORE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LOPALO, CHRISTOPHER) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
