STARKS v. DAVIS et al
Petitioner: MUMEEN STARKS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Case Number: 2:2018cv16525
Filed: November 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Presiding Judge: Susan D Wigenton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2019 Answer Due Deadline Update - The #4 Letter request submitted by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 2/19/2019. (gl, )
January 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting Respondents' #4 Letter request for an extension of time within which to file their answer on or before 2/19/2019. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 1/11/2019. (gl, )(n/m)
January 9, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by LUCILLE M. ROSANO on behalf of ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BRUCE DAVIS (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service on Petitioner)(ROSANO, LUCILLE)
January 9, 2019 Filing 4 Letter from Lucille M. Rosano re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order for Extension of Time, #2 Certificate of Service on Petitioner)(ROSANO, LUCILLE)
December 6, 2018 Filing 3 Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (HENDERSON, CAROL)
December 4, 2018 Notice of Electronic Filing and Order sent to all parties. (gl, )
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: If the Petition appears to be untimely, within (45) days of the date this Order is filed, Respondents may file a Motion to Dismiss on timeliness grounds only, etc.; If a Motion to Dismiss is filed, Petitioner shall have (30) days to file an opposition brief; If Petitioner files an opposition, Respondents shall have (10) days to file a reply brief; If Respondents do not file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition, they shall file a full and complete answer to all claims asserted in the Petition within (45) days of the entry of this Order, etc. Signed by Judge Susan D. Wigenton on 12/3/2018. (gl, )
November 27, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number NEW038044.), filed by MUMEEN STARKS. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Letter, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3)(ys, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STARKS v. DAVIS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Represented By: LUCILLE M. ROSANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRUCE DAVIS
Represented By: LUCILLE M. ROSANO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MUMEEN STARKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?