CLARK v. APPLE, INC. et al
JAMES CLARK and ANDREA CLARK |
APPLE, INC., XYZ INSURANCE COMPANIES 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
2:2018cv16907 |
December 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
Steven C Mannion |
John Michael Vazquez |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Scheduling Initial R16 Conference in Arbitration case for 2/21/2019 10:00 AM in Newark - Courtroom 2B before Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion on 1/10/2019. (spc, ) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/11/2019) (spc). |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ANDREA CLARK, JAMES CLARK. (VACCARO, MICHAEL) |
Filing 4 Answer and Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to Complaint by APPLE, INC..(SOKOLOFF, BRITTANY) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by BRITTANY HOPE SOKOLOFF on behalf of APPLE, INC. (SOKOLOFF, BRITTANY) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by APPLE, INC.. (BERRY, JILL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by APPLE, INC. from Superior Court of NJ, Law Division, Bergen County, case number BER-L-7944-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9220386), filed by APPLE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BERRY, JILL) |
Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge Steven C. Mannion. (jr) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.