KING v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
| ROBERT KING |
| MERCK & CO. INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P. and PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY |
| PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II) |
| 2:2018cv17543 |
| December 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., MERCK & CO. INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (gh, ) |
| Member Case Direct File on 12/24/18, for MDL 2789. (gh, ) |
| For all Case Management Orders #click here (gh, ) |
| Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge Mark Falk added. (gh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, L.P., MERCK & CO. INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9263918) with JURY DEMAND, filed by ROBERT KING. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(LONDON, MICHAEL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
