COLE et al v. IKEA US RETAIL LLC
| CRAIG BROWN and CAROLINE J. COLE |
| IKEA US RETAIL LLC |
| 2:2018cv17624 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| James B Clark |
| John Michael Vazquez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - The case you electronically filed has been processed, however, the following deficiencies were found: Cause of Action modified to 28:1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury. The Clerk's Office has made the appropriate changes. Please refer to the Attorney Case Opening Guide for processing electronically filed cases. (dam, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by IKEA US RETAIL LLC. (HARRIS, TODD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by IKEA US RETAIL LLC from Superior Court of NJ Essex County, case number ESX-L-7909-18. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9267673), filed by IKEA US RETAIL LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Certificate of Service Certification of Service)(HARRIS, TODD) |
| Case assigned to Judge John Michael Vazquez and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
