PICHARDO v. NOGAN et al
| NEW JERSEY |
| EDGAR PICHARDO |
| PATRICK A. NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY |
| 2:2019cv00635 |
| January 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Kevin McNulty |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter from EDGAR PICHARDO. (dam, ) |
| Filing 3 Letter request from DAG to be removed from noticing.. (HENDERSON, CAROL) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM and ORDER: The Clerk of the Court shall refile petitioner's amended petition (Civ.No. 13-6940, D.E.23) as an original petition in a separate habeas proceeding under a newly-assigned docket number; Petitioner may file and serve a reply to the answer within forty-five (45) days after respondents file the answer, see Rule 5(e) of Rules Governing 2254 Cases; within seven (7) days after the change in petitioner's custody status, be it release or otherwise, respondents shall electronically file a written notice of the same with the Clerk of the Court; the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on petitioner by regular U.S. mail; and the Clerk shall file this memorandum and order under both (a) the original docket number, Civ. No. 13-6930, and (b) the newly-assigned docket number; etc. Signed by Judge Kevin McNulty on 1/17/2019. (gl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
