SEDOU v. RODRIGUEZ et al
| KOFFI OGNADON SEDOU |
| JOHN TSOUKARIS, RONALD DONATO VITIELLO, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER |
| 2:2019cv01048 |
| January 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Jose L Linares |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER, that Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and it is further Ordered that Petitioner's #3 Motion seeking an Order to Show Cause is DENIED as moot; and it is finally Ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order upon the parties electronically and shall closed the file. Signed by Chief Judge Jose L. Linares on 3/11/2019. (JB, )
|
| ***Civil Case Terminated. (JB, ) |
| Filing 6 Letter from AUSA Hajdarpasic Regarding Request for Dismissal of Petition as Moot. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Order to Detain or Release Alien, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
| Filing 5 Substitution of Attorney - Attorney JOHN ANDREW RUYMANN terminated. Attorney ENES HAJDARPASIC for ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ added.. (HAJDARPASIC, ENES) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER, that to the extent that this matter is subject to the general stay imposed by the Court's Standing Oder 18-4, that Stay is LIFTED, and it is further Ordered, that Respondents Tsoukaris, Vitiello, Nielsen, and Whitaker are dismissed with prejudice as to sole respondents in a petition brought under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is the warden of the facility where the detainee is currently being held, in this case the remaining Respondent Orlando Rodrigues, etc. It is further Order that the Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of the Petition (ECF No. 1), and this Order upon Respondent Orlando Rodriguez by regular mail, with all costs of service advanced by the United States, etc. Signed by Chief Judge Jose L. Linares on 1/25/2018. (JB, )
|
| Chief Judge Jose L. Linares added. (eu, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order to Show Cause by KOFFI OGNADON SEDOU. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion for an Order to Show Cause Or, in the Alternative, an Order to Answer Expeditiously, #2 Text of Proposed Order to Show Cause, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Certificate of Service)(JOHNSON, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 2 BRIEF in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(JOHNSON, MATTHEW) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0312-9333009.), filed by Koffi Ognadon Sedou. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification Regarding Other Pending Actions in Accordance with Local Civil Rule 11.2, #3 Declaration of Koffi Sedou in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Certification of Lauren B. Major in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Certification of Matthew A. Johnson in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Exhibit G, #13 Exhibit H, #14 Exhibit I, #15 Exhibit J, #16 Exhibit K, #17 Exhibit L, #18 Exhibit M, #19 Exhibit N, #20 Exhibit O, #21 Exhibit P, #22 Exhibit Q, #23 Exhibit R, #24 Exhibit S, #25 Exhibit T, #26 Exhibit U, #27 Exhibit V, #28 Certificate of Service)(JOHNSON, MATTHEW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
