VOLPE v. TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY et al
| ANTHONY VOLPE and M.D. ANTHONY P. VOLPE |
| NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD SCHWARZ, TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY and Sean Swift |
| 2:2019cv05778 |
| February 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| James B Clark |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STIPULATION Extending Time to File Responsive Pleading by All Defendants. (SEIGLER, RAYMOND) |
| Clerk's Text Order - The document #2 Application for Clerk's Order submitted by TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY, NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN SWIFT, RICHARD SCHWARZ has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 3/20/2019. (dam, ) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Defendants. (GUO, QING) |
| Judge Claire C. Cecchi and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark added. (eu, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY, NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sean Swift, RICHARD SCHWARZ from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County, case number ESX-L-748-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9419067), filed by TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY, NUTLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sean Swift, RICHARD SCHWARZ. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certification of Service)(SEIGLER, RAYMOND) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
