AHN v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
JEFFREY M AHN, M.D. |
CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, JANES DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10 |
2:2019cv07141 |
February 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
James B Clark |
Kevin McNulty |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by JEFFREY M AHN, MD re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief may be Granted MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for More Definite Statement (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Chief Judge Linares Decision)(MITCHELL, AARON) |
Filing 6 Certification of Counsel for Defendant Regarding Non-Eligibility for Arbitration on behalf of CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (SARAVAY, ADAM) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief may be Granted MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for More Definite Statement . Motion set for 5/6/2019 before Judge Kevin McNulty. Unless otherwise directed by the Court, this motion will be decided on the papers and no appearances are required. Note that this is an automatically generated message from the Clerk`s Office and does not supersede any previous or subsequent orders from the Court. (nic, ) |
Filing 5 Rule 7.1(d)(5) Letter for an automatic extension of the return date of a dispositive motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief may be Granted MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for More Definite Statement . (MITCHELL, AARON) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief may be Granted, MOTION for Summary Judgment , MOTION for More Definite Statement by CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. Responses due by 4/1/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Motion (Plaintiffs' Complaint), #2 Brief in Support, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, #5 Declaration of Linda Havlik, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Exhibit G, #13 Exhibit H, #14 Exhibit I, #15 Certificate of Service)(WEINGART, SCOTT) |
Clerk`s Text Order - The document #3 Application for Clerk's Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order submitted by CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY has been GRANTED. The answer due date has been set for 03/20/2019. (sms) |
Filing 3 Application and Proposed Order for Clerk's Order to extend time to answer as to Defendant CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company.. (SARAVAY, ADAM) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY identifying Cigna Corporation as Corporate Parent.. (SARAVAY, ADAM) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY from New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County, case number BER-L-498-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9455198), filed by CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint, Summons, Track Assignment Notice))(SARAVAY, ADAM) |
Case assigned to Judge Kevin McNulty and Magistrate Judge James B. Clark. (jr) |
CLERK'S QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE - Please be advised, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 7.1, a disclosure statement is required to be filed by a nongovernmental corporate party. Please refer to the Court's website at www.njd.uscourts.gov for a form and filing instructions. (sms) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.