PAYNE v. IRONBOUND AMBULANCE SQUAD et al
| JARDELLA PAYNE |
| REYNA A BARRIOS and IRONBOUND AMBULANCE SQUAD |
| 2:2019cv07147 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Madeline Cox Arleo |
| Leda D Wettre |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER - A Scheduling Conference is set for 5/14/2019 at 11:00 AM in Newark - Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre.Signed by Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre on 4/10/2019. (kd)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , CROSSCLAIM against JARDELLA PAYNE by IRONBOUND AMBULANCE SQUAD, REYNA A BARRIOS. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Certificate of Service)(AYALA, YOLANDA) |
| Filing 3 Exhibit to #1 Notice of Removal, Form JS-44 by All Defendants. (AYALA, YOLANDA) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by IRONBOUND AMBULANCE SQUAD. (AYALA, YOLANDA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by IRONBOUND AMBULANCE SQUAD from Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Essex Vi, case number ESX-L-767-19. ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9455343), filed by IRONBOUND AMBULANCE SQUAD. (Attachments: #1 Index Exhibit A- S&C)(AYALA, YOLANDA) |
| Case assigned to Judge Madeline Cox Arleo and Magistrate Judge Leda D. Wettre. (jr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
