BLAKE v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
| PETER BLAKE |
| ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY |
| PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II) |
| 2:2019cv07184 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Jersey |
| Claire C Cecchi |
| Mark Falk |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Attached is the official court Summons, please fill out Defendant and Plaintiffs attorney information and serve. (gh, ) |
| Member Case Direct File on 2/27/19, for MDL 2789 PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II) (gh, ) |
| For all Case Management Orders #click here (gh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing and Admin fee $ 400 receipt number 0312-9456100) with JURY DEMAND, filed by PETER BLAKE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ROSEMERGY, JAMES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Jersey District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
